So what has changed?
The first development was the shift from college being necessary for
some of our workforce to it being the avowed goal for most of our
workforce. I won’t argue about whether
this is a reasonable goal, just that it is the de facto goal for most high
schools. That shift meant we are no
longer educating students who are already equipped with both learning skills
and motivation. Now we were/are being
asked to educate students who may be underprepared for college and not motivated
for its rigors.
The second development followed that increase in scope. Educating a dramatically wider population is
shifting our focus from how higher education traditionally measured itself—faculty
credentials, books in the library, research grants, etc.—to how prepared our
graduates are for the 21st century workforce. To understand how profound this shift is I
must turn to an example.
Those of you who are my age (baby boomers) remember what it
was like to shop for something before the Internet. We had to trust sales people. There was very little comparative information
(except for Consumer Reports). Pricing was a mystery. Compare that experience to now. You can enter your desired product into a
search field and immediately find websites that offer the product, compare it
to its peers, and offer prices for both new and used versions. The buyer now has all the power. When I was young, it was the seller who had the
power, although those sellers had huge problems introducing their products to the
public.
Another huge change is the ability for consumers to drive
product demand and offerings. Via the
Internet, consumers now freely post reviews, like/dislikes, suggestions and
requests for new products and services.
When I went to school, institutional reputation was
determined by how exclusive a college was.
The fewer students it accepted from its applicant pool, the better it
was. Now, Internet resources permit consumers
to ask much deeper questions about institutions, to compare them across more
dimensions, to see what students think about their faculty, and finally, to
compare prices. These emerging
capabilities, when viewed through the larger educational mission of higher
education, spell change. Our customers are now able to ask deep
questions about our results. How many
students do we graduate? What sorts of
jobs do they get? How much do they earn? Can they repay their student loans? Will you
offer an online master's degree? Can I
earn a credential in logistics, energy or education?
These questions signal a shift in power from the sellers—higher education institutions—to the buyers—students. We saw this happen in every major industry as technology forced established companies to re-invent themselves (e.g. IBM, American Express, McDonald's) or be replaced (Kodak).
In my next posting I will talk about some of the concrete
actions higher education and Charter Oak are taking to adapt to this shift. To help me address those actions, please
share with me the most important factors to you when decided what college to
attend. What questions did you ask?