So what has changed?
The first development was the shift from college being necessary for
some of our workforce to it being the avowed goal for most of our
workforce. I won’t argue about whether
this is a reasonable goal, just that it is the de facto goal for most high
schools. That shift meant we are no
longer educating students who are already equipped with both learning skills
and motivation. Now we were/are being
asked to educate students who may be underprepared for college and not motivated
for its rigors.
The second development followed that increase in scope. Educating a dramatically wider population is
shifting our focus from how higher education traditionally measured itself—faculty
credentials, books in the library, research grants, etc.—to how prepared our
graduates are for the 21st century workforce. To understand how profound this shift is I
must turn to an example.
Those of you who are my age (baby boomers) remember what it
was like to shop for something before the Internet. We had to trust sales people. There was very little comparative information
(except for Consumer Reports). Pricing was a mystery. Compare that experience to now. You can enter your desired product into a
search field and immediately find websites that offer the product, compare it
to its peers, and offer prices for both new and used versions. The buyer now has all the power. When I was young, it was the seller who had the
power, although those sellers had huge problems introducing their products to the
public.
Another huge change is the ability for consumers to drive
product demand and offerings. Via the
Internet, consumers now freely post reviews, like/dislikes, suggestions and
requests for new products and services.
When I went to school, institutional reputation was
determined by how exclusive a college was.
The fewer students it accepted from its applicant pool, the better it
was. Now, Internet resources permit consumers
to ask much deeper questions about institutions, to compare them across more
dimensions, to see what students think about their faculty, and finally, to
compare prices. These emerging
capabilities, when viewed through the larger educational mission of higher
education, spell change. Our customers are now able to ask deep
questions about our results. How many
students do we graduate? What sorts of
jobs do they get? How much do they earn? Can they repay their student loans? Will you
offer an online master's degree? Can I
earn a credential in logistics, energy or education?
These questions signal a shift in power from the sellers—higher education institutions—to the buyers—students. We saw this happen in every major industry as technology forced established companies to re-invent themselves (e.g. IBM, American Express, McDonald's) or be replaced (Kodak).
In my next posting I will talk about some of the concrete
actions higher education and Charter Oak are taking to adapt to this shift. To help me address those actions, please
share with me the most important factors to you when decided what college to
attend. What questions did you ask?
The three most important factors for me were (1) the school being credible, (2) to minimize time to completion, and (3) to minimize expense. Charter Oak obviously met the first requirement easily, and by letting me make full use of transfer credit and CLEP tests satisfied the other two as well.
ReplyDeleteMore than anything, I needed flexibility. With a demanding job and a family, I had to be able to work at my own pace and on my own schedule. Affordability and quality were also important. Charter Oak had all that, and allowed me to earn a degree that I'm proud of.
ReplyDeleteThanks Steven and Jeanne. Keep these comments coming as we are collecting them to share with the staff.
ReplyDeleteWe are committed to remaining Adult friendly, low cost, and high quality. Your stories help us understand how well we are doing meeting those goals.
Ed
I feel there is a disconnect at your institution between what is being marketed to students and what is actually being taught. Why did I sign up to attend a class where I read a few chapters from an $80 text book and have some person review my thoughts on a chapter with no real additional insight? I expected some sort of guidance, insight and ideas to be provided. I craved a platform to truly share ideas and collaborate. All I got was a schedule of when to review chapters and how many questions I should answer at the end of it.
ReplyDeleteHigher education has become less essential because for some degrees or jobs it makes no difference. If your business department doesn't have any great insights into business how am I not better served reading expert opinions and guides for free online, engaging in discussions on forums and taking the cost of attending your university and investing into my own business?
I'm young and highly motivated to learn but Charter Oak was a massive let down in my eyes. I went as far as trying to get my money back because I just did not see myself using what I was 'learning'. Before I started attending the online classes I wanted a degree and two weeks into the program I knew it was worthless.
Thanks for sharing your experience. Your argument is actually more common that you might suspect. For adult students, relevance is at least as important as the credential. In other words, since our adult students are already in the job market, they demand that each course be relevant to improving their personal work efficacy. We believe that taken as a whole, our program does improve workplace skills, but you have made a case that the one experience you had did not.
DeleteThanks for keeping us focused on improving each of our courses until all of them pass the test you have articulated.
Ed